Resources

Access helpful guidance and resources to strengthen your application.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
No results found
Try using different keywords or checking your spelling.

The Building the Future Workforce Challenge team has compiled a variety of resources for participants to utilize as they prepare their applications. Applicants are strongly encouraged to review the following definitions of key terms, tools, and other guidance and information to help strengthen your proposed solution for the Building the Future Workforce Challenge.

Timeline for testing phase

Awards are expected to be announced in early 2027 and the earliest start date for the two-year project period that applicants may use for planning purposes is March 2027. All dates are subject to change.

Illustrative timeline for the maximum two-year project period may include:

~6 months:
...to adapt/finalize solution with test facility
~6-12 months:
...to test solution
~6-18 months:
...for evaluation, noting that testing can continue concurrently to evaluation. Key metrics may include, but are not limited to, partnership fit, immediate outputs and outcomes, potential for benefits/impact beyond project period, and resources/ROI/additional funding to sustain the solution beyond project period.

Note: On the application form, teams must demonstrate they will meet all staffing, funding, and other resource requirements necessary to begin the two-year project period in March 2027. Applicants will have opportunity to explain financial plans and other funding sources on the application under Contingency & Financial Sustainability and Other Project Financing.

Why we’re launching this challenge

Problem statement: Manufacturing and technical industries face growing challenges when attracting new talent, retaining workers and keeping skills current amid rapid technological change. Training and career paths are often fragmented, slow to adapt, or hard to scale—limiting efforts to engage new workers, support current employees, and meet employer needs. The industry needs adaptive, scalable solutions that make these careers more visible and appealing, prepare workers for immediate and long-term success, and expand successful models.

Additional background on the problem statements includes:

1. Workforce pipeline
After decades of slow hiring, the manufacturing workforce has been growing since 2010. However, since 2018, there have been persistently high job openings and a growing turnover rate among the manufacturing and industry technician workforce. This suggests employers cannot fill all the positions they need to grow – and they are losing people they have invested in training and supporting. What can be done to make manufacturing jobs more attractive to job-seekers and incumbent workers?
2. Innovation readiness
Manufacturing and industry technician training programs want to provide the skills of the future, while also preparing workers to thrive in the jobs that are currently available. However, it’s not always clear what the technologies and skills of the future will be. How can training programs deliver adaptable skills that prepare workers to play a constructive role in technology adoption and upgrading?
3. Collective action
Training doesn’t just happen on the job. Curricula in high schools, vocational programs, and colleges all matter for supporting a workforce that can thrive on the factory floor. Research on job training consistently emphasizes the importance of coordination between employers, training programs, and government to design programs that are affordable, deliver valuable skills, and meet rigorous educational standards. However, given the diverse interests at the table, collective action can be challenging and time-consuming. How can we support approaches that facilitate collective action?
4. Scalability problem
There are success stories in workforce development, including models like sector partnerships and regional programs which boast high job placement and employer satisfaction. However, many of these programs have been expensive to deliver and difficult to scale. Reports from community colleges suggest that manufacturing workforce programs often face low enrollment. What can be done to scale up successful programs at an affordable rate?
5. Sustainability challenge
Related to the scalability problem, workforce development is too often viewed as a cost. How can solutions present and generate evidence to demonstrate a return on investment for investing in workforce development? How can stakeholders (where appropriate) involved in collective action move to expecting other forms of capital than grant funding?

Solution categories

A core requirement of every solution is its ability to stay relevant as technology evolves—ensuring breakthrough innovation and human potential rise together. All proposals must align with one or more of the following solution categories of the Building the Future Workforce Challenge.

Build interest and awareness of advanced manufacturing and industry technician careers:
Shift perceptions among students, teachers, parents, and/or other key influencers by showcasing the opportunities available in modern manufacturing and technician careers.
Prepare new workforce entrants for “day one” success:
Implement flexible, sustainable solutions that keep pace with technology and industry needs, enabling learners to arrive job‑ready and increasing the likelihood of retention.
Upskill and reskill the current manufacturing and industry technician workforce:
Expand career pathways and mobility by implementing flexible, sustainable solutions that keep pace with technology, enabling current employees to build new technical and leadership capabilities.

Solution Locations

Applicants will have the opportunity to pilot and implement their proposed solution at one or more Caterpillar facilities or communities in the U.S., Brazil, India, or Mexico. While applicants may be located anywhere in the world, teams will be required to describe how and why they are ready and equipped to test their solution at the location selected.

Note: While cross‑country replicability is preferred, the Building the Future Workforce Challenge team recognizes this may not always be feasible due to differences in policy, culture, and other factors. Transformative solutions will not be penalized for scalability (see below and scoring rubric) if they can only be replicated within one country.

Scalability

Scalability is one of four criteria further defined on our scoring rubric. Winners of the Building the Future Workforce Challenge will have the opportunity to pilot their proposed solutions in a Caterpillar facility or community, with further potential to scale depending on results.

Proposed solutions should have strong potential to be replicated and/or to generate learnings that are relevant within or beyond the local workforce ecosystem. Applicants are encouraged to identify the key factors and principles that make their solution successful in a pilot environment, and what resources are required for success in other contexts and workplaces.  

Note: While cross‑country replicability is preferred, the Building the Future Workforce Challenge team recognizes this may not always be feasible due to differences in policy, culture, and other factors. Transformative solutions will not be penalized for scalability (see scoring rubric) if they can only be replicated within one country.

Solution stage & evidence of effectiveness

All applicants must provide clear data and evidence that the approach has delivered the proposed results and impact. Eligible solutions will be at one of the following project stages:

Validated Concept
Early‑stage idea that has undergone testing or review, producing initial evidence that the approach is effective and worth further development
Proof of Concept
Solution tested on a small scale with internal evaluations or outcomes assessments that demonstrate feasibility in real‑world or controlled environments
Validated Solution
Solution with demonstrated effectiveness, supported by measurable outcomes and consistent performance across multiple settings or implementations
Ready to Scale
Proven solution with strong internal and external evidence indicating it is prepared for broader, large‑scale implementation with fidelity
Operating at Scale
Mature solution that is widely deployed, supported by established external assessments of impact, and benefiting from ongoing iteration to further strengthen outcomes

Note: On the application form, teams must demonstrate they will meet all staffing, funding, and other resource requirements necessary to begin the two-year project period in March 2027 (dates subject to change). Applicants will have opportunity to explain financial plans and other funding sources on the application under Contingency & Financial Sustainability and Other Project Financing.

Private benefit

The Internal Revenue Code expressly prohibits the use of an organization’s assets or earnings in a manner that would give rise to “private inurement” to any insider of the organization. A derivative of the private inurement doctrine is the private benefit doctrine. The private benefit doctrine requires that any private benefit arising from charitable activities be “incidental” compared to the public benefit from such activities. Any private benefit must be both qualitatively and quantitatively incidental to the public benefits to be achieved. 

A private benefit is qualitatively incidental if it is “a necessary concomitant of the activity which benefits the public” in the sense that the “benefit to the public cannot be achieved without necessarily benefiting certain private individuals. The IRS has determined that benefits are qualitatively incidental to the public benefit where it would be impossible for an organization to accomplish its exempt purposes without providing the private benefits.

Private benefit will be quantitatively incidental if it is insubstantial when compared with the public benefit conferred. An acceptable amount of the private benefit will vary in each case “in direct relation to the degree of public benefit derived.” To the extent that there is more private benefit, it must be outweighed by more substantial public benefit.

Common examples of private benefit include:

  • A scholarship fund exclusively for children of staff members for the organization
  • A program that exclusively helps a small, select group of people rather than the community as a whole
  • A contract that benefits the for-profit business partner and not the nonprofit organization/charitable purpose

Join the Building the Future Workforce Challenge

Together, we can transform the advanced manufacturing and industry technician workforce—building the talent communities need today and unlocking the skills the industry will depend on tomorrow.
REGISTER NOW XX
Scroll to the top